![]() Second of all… none of it makes any sense. Woods admitted that it was “not likely” to be real, but still noted “that there is a distinct possibility this could be real.” First of all, there was no such distinct possibility. It was what appeared to be a fairly obvious satirical fake meme urging men to stay home on election day to let women’s vote have more weight. It seems that Twitter suspended his access to his account because of a meme he had tweeted. ![]() ![]() Now Woods is in another situation, where - somewhat incredibly - he’s trying to make himself out as a free speech warrior. We noted, instead, that we hoped he won the case - and he did. That said, when Woods’ own free speech is attacked via a similarly bogus defamation lawsuit over his own tweets, we didn’t support the plaintiff just because it was against Woods. Gloating over their death takes you up a few notches to being a horrible human being. Suing someone for being mildly critical of you is bad. Suffice it to say, Woods is - in our opinion - a terrible human being. In the middle of that lawsuit, the (still) anonymous tweeter died, leading Woods to gloat about “winning” the case and about the guy’s death. After all, he’s the guy who sued an anonymous Twitter user for a somewhat mild comeback that referenced cocaine usage (leaving aside that Woods himself had tweeted very similar hyperbolic tweets suggesting people he was arguing with were on crack). I think we’ve made our general feelings about James Woods perfectly clear. Fri, Sep 28th 2018 09:38am - Mike Masnick
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |